Lubin urges rejection of tax cap
NYSUT Executive Vice President Alan Lubin testified today before the state Commission on Property Tax Relief, urging members to reject proposals to cap school property taxes.
"I will say to you what I've said to the governor, legislative leaders, and others around the state: A tax cap proposal would take us in the wrong direction at a time when New York's progress in education is being recognized," Lubin told the commission.
- Related Article: Testimony to the Commission on Property Tax Relief
- Media Release: Proposed tax cap 'bad policy' for state's school children
- Worksheet: How would a tax cap impact your school district's funding?
Lubin shared examples outlining the disastrous results tax cap proposals have caused in other states and noted caps will not contain the rising costs school districts face to cover health care or fuel. New Yorkers already have local control that they exercise every May when they vote on their school budgets, Lubin said.
The statewide union supports property tax "circuit breakers," which target aid to low and moderate-income homeowners, as an alternative to the state's STAR property tax relief program.
Lubin offered several cost-saving suggestions for schools, including a system of regionalized purchasing, transportation, school boards or administration services.
"The commission has the grave responsibility of recommending ways to appropriately reduce costs while upholding every child's constitutional entitlement to a sound, basic education," Lubin noted. "The challenge is to focus resources on services to children and reduce the non-instructional and administrative service costs through appropriate economies of scale and efficiencies."
"The right kind of cap." Research shows that arbitrary tax caps erode local control, dismantle strong district programs and penalize the poorest communities.
In the media
WORKSHEET: How would a tax cap impact your school district's funding? Use this simple, handy online worksheet to find out how much your district would have already lost if a tax cap had been implemented in 2005.
NYSUT ANALYSIS: Report of the Commission on Property Tax Relief. While acknowledging the need for property tax relief, NYSUT says the commission's proposal would harm public education and 'is the wrong approach to alleviating the unfair burden placed on some homeowners.'
Updates
- Daily Gazette: Outlook grim for tax cap bill
- AP: Union foes killing property tax cap in NY Legislature
- Daily News: NYSUT hits the air waves against Paterson
- Times Union: Burying the tax cap
- Editorial: Tax cap would have unforeseen consequences
- NY Times: Property tax gimmick does more harm than good
- Governor's endorsement sets stage for conflicts
- Fiscal Fairness response to commission report
- BALCONY reponse to commission report
- Panel recommends capping school taxes at 4 percent
- A hunger for a property-tax cap, but the teachers' union isn't feeling it
- NYSUT Testimony to the Commission on Property Tax Relief
- Lubin urges rejection of tax cap
- NYSUT activists to urge Legislature to keep the promise
- Transition in Albany raises questions on cap
- Iannuzzi: Let's not cap our ability to end gap
- Weingarten: Our kids deserve better than cuts and caps
- Legislators voice objections over tax caps.
- Superintendent makes case for opposing tax caps.
Research and Analysis
- Property tax caps limit educational investment
- Research shows negative effects of property tax caps
- Hidden Consequences: Lessons from Massachusetts
- NYSUT Testimony to the Commission on Property Tax Relief
'Yes' votes prevail as 92 percent of budgets pass. Last year, New York voters acknowledged continued academic progress and generally lower property tax increases.
Success stories: Celebrating progess in public education. Scores on state math and English language arts tests have been rising, with some significant gains in historically at-risk demographics.
Success stories: Photo gallery. Good news in photos from public schools in Buffalo, Suffolk, New York City and more.
