Why would we jeopardize New York's progress in public education with arbitrary tax caps?

Education Week just announced that New York state leads the nation in education standards, quality tests and accountability. The national experts at Education Trust cited New York's progress in closing the gap for children in poverty. New York leads the nation in the prestigious Intel science competition. We lead the nation in AP and SAT participation. Test scores are rising, students are working to higher standards than ever before and voters last spring approved 95 percent of school budgets - the highest rate in state history.
Why would we jeopardize this progress with arbitrary tax caps?
Research shows they erode local control, dismantle strong district programs and penalize the poorest communities.
New York's students are learning - don't cap their futures.
Take action!
Update 4/29
- How would a tax cap impact your school district's funding?
- NY Times: A hunger for a property-tax cap, but the teachers' union isn't feeling it
Update 4/23
- Lubin urges rejection of tax cap
- NYSUT Testimony to the Commission on Property Tax Relief
- Media Release: Proposed tax cap 'bad policy' for state's school children
Update 3/13
- Transition in Albany raises questions on property tax cap, education endowment.. Albany Times Union.
Learn more
- Property tax caps would limit educational investment
- Research shows negative effects of property tax caps
- Success stories: Celebrating progress in public education
- Voters approve a record 95.5 percent of school budgets
NYSUT has launched a communications campaign portraying students in mortarboards, with the message, "The right kind of cap." The campaign message is two-fold: first, to highlight the progress students are making and the importance of education as the engine to New York's economy, and to share concerns about the dangers of an arbitrary cap on school taxes. The campaign includes information on the impact of tax cap plans in other states; and ways to reduce local property tax burdens without removing local control or jeopardizing the progress students are making in working to higher standards.
"The right kind of cap." Research shows that arbitrary tax caps erode local control, dismantle strong district programs and penalize the poorest communities.
Updates
- How would a tax cap impact your school district's funding?
- NY Times: A hunger for a property-tax cap, but the teachers' union isn't feeling it
- NYSUT Testimony to the Commission on Property Tax Relief
- Lubin urges rejection of tax cap
- NYSUT activists to urge Legislature to keep the promise
- Transition in Albany raises questions on property tax cap, education endowment. Times Union
- Iannuzzi: Let's not cap our ability to end gap
- Weingarten: Our kids deserve better than cuts and caps
- County executives, Speaker Silver voice objections over tax caps. Newsday.
- Superintendent makes case for opposing tax caps. Poughkeepsie Journal.
How would a tax cap impact your school district's funding? Use this simple, handy online worksheet to find out how much your district would have already lost if a tax cap had been implemented in 2005.
Property tax caps would limit educational investment. Property tax caps have damaged public education in other states and would threaten the progress being made by New York students.
Research shows negative effects of property tax caps. The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities reports that caps damaging to education and other public services.
Voters approve a record 95.5 percent of school budgets. Last year, New York voters acknowledged continued academic progress and generally lower property tax increases.
Success stories: Celebrating progess in public education. Scores on state math and English language arts tests have been rising, with some significant gains in historically at-risk demographics.
Success stories: Photo gallery. Good news in photos from public schools in Buffalo, Suffolk, New York City and more.
