NYSUT
ENTER
|
ADVANCED SEARCH
Home Page
Psychologist Due Process Hospital Privileges
November 20, 2008
Subject:
RE: Psychologist Due Process Hospital Privileges
I am writing to you as a member the New York State Psychological Association (NYSPA) which is a professional association representing over 3,000 psychologists in New York State and an affiliate of the New York State United Teachers (NYSUT). As such, I am seeking your support on legislation (A.6340/S.4644) which provides psychologists due process in the event of denial by hospitals of license appropriate privileges and/or medical staff membership. Currently, psychologists are not included among the health practitioners who are afforded such rights. Historically, the section of the Public Health Law (§ 2801-b) which provides the aforementioned protections to certain health practitioners (namely, physicians, dentists, podiatrists and optometrists) was established to prohibit hospitals from engaging in improper and discriminatory practices with respect to hospital staff appointments and the extension of license appropriate professional privileges to certain health care practitioners. This legislation would add psychologists to those practitioners noted above and to, thus, be afforded the same due process protections. In addition, the legislation would make failure of a hospital to act upon the application for staff membership or professional privilege by a psychologist without stating the reasons for denial an improper practice. Should the reasons for denial be unrelated to standards of patients care, patient welfare, the objectives of the institution or the character or competency of the psychologists applying for the privileges would also be considered an improper practice. A recently enacted scope of practice law recognizes that psychologists independently diagnose and treat mental illness. NY State Health Department regulations (10 NYCRR) allow hospitals to grant staff membership and professional privileges (Section 407.8a; 407.1f), to “any licensed independent practitioner” and this is consistent with current Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) policy. The only implication and outcome of this amendment is to give nothing more to psychologists beyond the constraints of the laws and regulations that currently govern their practice, when expecting appropriate recognition of their professional status from hospitals. The kinds of concerns that prompted the professions currently covered by PHL 2801-b to seek its protections, should also be seen as applicable to, and the reasonable right, of psychologists. They certainly deserve the same protections as the other professionals noted in PHL 2801-b and for the same reasons. Hospitals should be expected to apply their policies equitably to all health practitioners, consistent with current law, regulation and ethical professional practice. This is an issue that is very important to NYSPA and I hope I can we count on you to support towards our legislative ends.
We will add your signature from the information you provide.
F
irst Name
*
L
ast Name
*
E
mail
*
Street
1
*
Street
2
C
ity
*
S
tate/Province
*
Select a state
Alabama
Alaska
American Samoa
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
D.C.
Florida
Georgia
Guam
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virgin Islands
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Armed Forces (the) Americas
Armed Forces Europe
Armed Forces Pacific
Alberta
British Columbia
Manitoba
Newfoundland
New Brunswick
Nova Scotia
Northwest Territories
Nunavut
Ontario
Prince Edward Island
Quebec
Saskatchewan
Yukon Territory
Other
Z
ip/Postal Code
*