May 2017 Issue
April 25, 2017

Delegates reject constitutional amendments

Source: NYSUT United

After passionate debate, delegates to the NYSUT Representative Assembly rejected four proposed constitutional amendments that would have eliminated one of NYSUT's five officers and allowed regional voting for NYSUT Board members and statewide officers.

The proposed amendments called for:

  • eliminating NYSUT's second vice president position;
  • allowing regional Election District meetings so certified delegates could cast ballots without attending the RA;
  • allowing special Election District meetings to fill all officer and director at-large vacancies as they occur, rather than having them filled by the NYSUT Board; and
  • electing at-large directors by a majority of representatives of their respective constituencies, rather than by a statewide vote by delegates at the RA.

Nate Hathaway, president of Malone Federation of Teachers, spoke in favor of the amendment to eliminate one statewide officer position to save money. "This organization is under economic stress. Given that, this would be a move in the right direction ... And save over $350,000."

Mahopac Teachers Association Tom McMahon spoke against the idea, noting the officers devised a reorganization plan that will save three times more than eliminating a single officer position. "I don't think we should be asking our officers to do more with less," McMahon said. "Something will fall by the wayside."

In a voice vote, delegates confirmed the committee's recommendation to reject the amendment and keep all five statewide officers.

Michael Lillis, Lakeland FT spoke in favor of the second proposal, which called for regional voting for statewide officers and Board members, in addition to voting at the RA.

"Democracy should be the lifeblood of this organization. We should do anything we can to expand participation," he said. Lillis noted a delegation from Buffalo was forced to drive to the RA in New York City because their flight was cancelled — just so they could vote for their statewide officers. Under the proposed amendment, the delegates could have voted at their regional office, Lillis said. But Pamela Malone of United University Professions said allowing regional voting would diminish RA attendance. "These RAs are an opportunity to network, promote solidarity," she said. "As a higher education member, I rely on these to learn about my brothers and sisters in K–12."

A voice vote was too close to call, so delegates were asked to stand and be counted. The amendment went down by 284 votes.

Regarding the third proposed amendment, Alan Trevithick of Westchester CC FT made the case that NYSUT's legislative program calls for early voting and other measures to promote the "sacred right" to vote in general elections.

"This amendment would promote stronger participation in NYSUT," he said. "You'll be voting for real inclusion and real unity." Others argued that allowing regional voting would add costs and be difficult for retiree representation. The measure also failed.

On the final proposed amendment, Rob Ciani of Commack TA said allowing representatives to be elected by their respective constituencies would eliminate frustration and anger by those who believe that a statewide vote is unfair.

"It's a healing for brothers and sisters who feel their voice has been lost," he said. "It would empower so many locals across New York State."

Sandie Carner-Shafran, an SRP member of the NYSUT Board, noted the importance of NYSUT's many constituencies — SRPs, retirees, health care and higher education — to be elected on a statewide basis. "We should be expanding their representation, not limiting it."

NYSUT Footer
Our Voice, Our Values, Our Union